I have a comment about the "injectiuon gun". ....the jetguns useed to vaccinate the military until 1999.
Veterans have the highest rate of Hepatitis C infection. 1 in every 10 Veterans is infected .....62.7% of Vietnam Veterans have Hep C.....most don't know it. The second most frequent group is post-Vietnam at 18.2%, followed by 4.8% Korean conflict, 4.3% post-Korean conflict, 4.2% from WWII, and 2.7% Persian Gulf era veterans.
http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/schedule106/apr00/4-13ben/groselle.htm There is now new evidence showing that jetguns did get contaminated. The initial impact of the jet on the skin produces some splash and there was blood that backed up into the multi-dose vaccine vials. Nobody wore gloves to give vaccines, they didn't clean the skin before injecting, AND THEY DIDN'T WIPE THE JET GUN BETWEEN RECRUITS AS PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS.
http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n7/full/nrd2076.htmlDr Lawrence Deyton MSPH, MD Chief Consultant, Public Health Strategic Health Care Group for the Veterans Administration, admitted that infection from jet injectors is possible. Same thing the WHO said.
http://www.hcvets.com/data/transmission_methods/plan_backfires.htmNow we just have to get the CDC to admit it and stop blaming their infection on drug use alone. (Most of their studies look at the same risk factors....IV drugs, transfusions and sex. I can tell them exactly what they're going to find out without even reading the study protocol. They don't look at other risk factors like jetgun injections, sharing razors, haircuts, dental procedures with improperly sterilized instruments while in the military, etc.). It amazes me that they continue to deny it when their own unpublished studies SHOW THAT JETGUNS DID TRANSMIT INFECTION, whether the skin was cleaned or not and that the vaccine vials got contaminated.
http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/meetings/dec2003/Contents/ThursdayPM/Weniger.pdf (Starting on page 29)
Their excuse for continuing to use the jetguns until 1999 when we finally got the FDA to ban their use......
"The benefit of being able to vaccinate large numbers of people outweighed the risk of infection for a few."
Except that 62.7% is not "A FEW".
A recent study on 113,927 Veterans under the care of the Veterans Administration, showed that from those that tested positive for Hepatitis C, ONLY 11.8% are approved for treatment. Reasons why patients were not prescribed treatment were:
- Age, Minority race, Alcohol or drug use, Hepatitis B co-infection, having had a stroke in the past, MILD depression, Bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia, Liver cirrhosis, anemia, low platelets, and diabetes.
Considering that the Hepatitis C virus causes diabetes, depression and cirrhosis..... that cirrhosis causes anemia and low platelets, denying treatment for those reasons seems ridiculous at best. Treatment success rate for Veterans is only 19%. The VA is still using 2003 treatment guidelines which do NOT allow for the use of Procrit or Neupogen. Instead, they reduce doses or stop the treatment.
19% success rate from 11.8% who are approved for treatment. That means we're letting most of them die. There is now a Bill from Congress that says that if a Veteran requests to have a Hep C test done at any of the VA clinics, they HAVE TO DO IT. But they won't offer....the Veteran has to ask....and sometimes Vets are not notified when the test is positive.
Why did I tell you all this?
It seemed the right thing to do on Memorial Day. Perhaps you can pass the word.
star