Well....I've been
boning up on this a little. A brief summary first. Ovewr a year ago I saw a post by Drobie and asked him to post his experiences here. There is some debate about the validity of some types of treatment; you'll see and hear that. My feeling is that sometimes heppers end up serving as guinea pigs for all kinds of alternative treatments. It's a great thing about boards; they serve as a repository of anectdotal experiences. The blade certainly can cut both directions people can be hurt experimenting people could also get some benefit. I'm in no position to recommend or dissuade on this treatment. I did think it was useful to have a thread on the topic.
Let me summarize Drobies case. He claims that he was suggested this treatment by a doctor. He has numerous treatments. He claims that he has felt better from the treatment. He claimed that his meld score dropped after several treatments. Based on this.... I asked him to post his story. I didn't know much about the therapy. I wanted to understand the principles involved that could aid someone with a meld score of 14.
The update...... I know a 21 year old who is currently awaiting a liver transplant. They have a meld about 24 and are very very sick. When redrodeo mentioned that he was doing HBOT I thought about the post by Drobie and wondered...... what would the updated information be from a guy who has been doing this another year? I wrote him and asked for an update. I'll admit; I was hoping for something that could help a 21 year old with bleeds, encelepathy and all the attendant problems of ESLD. This is not a treatment that I'm promoting.... but I do wonder....did wonder if some beneficial aspect could help keep this kid alive a little longer while they await a liver. I wrote Drobie..... and he was kind enough to respond to my note.
I don't have any answers. I'm hardly in a position to make recommendations.
Rainbow does have extensive medical background in the area of HCV and TX as well as a solid general medical background. It's clear that she is concerned about the effectiveness and safety of the treatment. As a side benefit....we get to read up on the process....learn about the treatment or some contrindications.
I've provided a few links which describe the process, it's history and the uses of HBOT; both accepted and perhaps contested by the medical community. Before I post some of these links and discussions I want to point out that Drobie is not selling anything. He is a HCV infected person who believes that HBOT has helped him. My understanding was that he wanted to share his experience. I believe that he also posted his origional thread asking for any peoples experiences. He's just another on of us and like us he can also use some constructive input, education or suggestions about his own situation. I thank Drobie for sharing. I also thank Rainbow for providing some feedback about the process and it's ramifications
best,
Willy
I don't know if this will all fit onto one post...... but I'll try. The first and easiest issue was the fire danger in HBOT. This is dated information...... about 10 years old. In 79 years worldwide there were about 1 fatality per year worldwide;
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2833155Résumé / Abstract
Fire can be catastrophic in the confined space of a hyperbaric chamber. From 1923 to1996, 77 human fatalities occurred in 35 hyperbaric chamber fires, three human fatalities in a pressurized Apollo Command Module, and two human fatalities in three hypobaric chamber fires reported in Asia, Europe, and North America. Two fires occurred in diving bells, eight occurred in recompression (or decompression) chambers, and 25 occurred in clinical hyperbaric chambers. No fire fatalities were reported in the clinical hyperbaric chambers ofNorth America. Chamber fires before 1980 were principally caused by electrical ignition. Since 1980, chamber fires have been primarily caused by prohibited sources of ignition that an occupant carried inside the chamber. Each fatal chamber fire has occurred in an enriched oxygen atmosphere (>28% oxygen) and in the presence of abundant burnable material. Chambers pressurized with air (<23.5% oxygen) had the only survivors. Information in this report was obtained from the literature and from the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society's Chamber Experience and Mishap Database. This epidemiologic review focuses on information learned from critical analyses of chamber fires and how it can be applied to safe operation of hypobaric and hyperbaric chambers.
(EDIT: PS: By deaths I obviously have meant deaths due to fires within HBO chanbers. I'm not sure if one could easily come by other fatalities or medical issues involved from the use of HBOT. Certainly this could be a larger number. - Willy------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below are a list of links about the process. I start out rather objective..... with the most creditable sources. My goal is to learn about the process as it pertains to HCV or attendant illnesses and symptoms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbaric_oxygen_therapyhttp://www.emedicine.com/plastic/topic526.htmhttp://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/317/7166/1140http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/97/7------------------------------------------
I next wanted to know..... how or why could this work? In the first 4 links I found not much suggestiing that HBOT could be useful with HCV, ESLD, etc. Since some of the treatments are controversial I went to a site that was making some claims. I include that site. I include a link to a list of diseases and symptoms they use HBOT for. I'm not endorsing; I'm trying to round out the information. i want to compare what the technical sites provide and compare it to a site that sells treatments.
http://www.drcranton.com/hbo/HBOT_Increases_Stem_Cells.htmhttp://www.drcranton.com/hbo/conditions_treated.htmCirrhosis, Rheumatoid arthritis (acute) ----these are the two main posibilities which I could come up with from a site which sells HBOT treatment. Admittedly, this may have to be taken with a grain of salt..... but I thought....well; why not google "HBOT and cirrhosis""
Below is that study;
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WM6-4H16S5G-6&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=3661f90822a97765cd58fe21b22207ac"Beneficial Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygenation on Liver Regeneration in Cirrhosis"
-----------------------------------------------------------
Now...... I got to read their conclusion....I got to get the title..... but I am not a member of the org that houses these trials. I could read 1 page for free; the rest was pay per view.
That's where I end my research for the night. At least I got it up on the board.
Good enough for tonight anyway....
best,
Willy
Edit.... by the way....that last study was a Japonese study....on mice. I so far have not been able to come up with study results with people specifically about HCV or presumably with advanced liver disease. There seems little question that the treatment would help with anemia, but at a level of risk and expense. I think there could be e tendency to presume that a higher oxygen content could cause regeneration of the liver..... but a large part of the damage of cirrhosis is fibrosis; I'm not sure that extra oxygen would remove that. Some forms of cancer also thrive in an oxygen rich enviroment in which HBOT is not recommended. I still look at this a a chance to take a closer look at this and see any potential benefits and drawbacks. There are not that many people who have used HBOT either as a means of mitigating symptoms or damage (I understand that these may be contentions that are not proven) . According to the Wikipedia article this topic has been argued somewhat in pubmed articles/studies.....and so there may be more data than I've come across.